Who Will Vince Vote For?
 

So here comes the 2004 elections. Kerry Versus Bush. People seem to think I don't stand for anything because I've pretty much been dragging both candidates right through the dirt. Well, let's weigh them out, shall we?

Bush: This 4 year champion of oppressed Camel Jockeys has the record to actually look at. So far, he's helped unite a country because of September 11th, avenge his father, and go hunting for non existent WMDS. I'm not going to get into the schematics about the WMDS and their location or lack thereof because, let's be honest, not one American in this country really has any clue and anyone saying they do is lying. Bush cut taxes but then also cut overtime pay to the lower class. He has tried to ban gay marriage to no avail as no one wants to be his co-pilot when this ship crashes in the sea of morals.

 

Kerry: Kerry is a tool. Let's face it. The only thing you know about Kerry is 1)He doesn't stand for a damn thing - the guy changes his mind at every corner. 2)In light of recent events we also discovered he's homo-erotic. The one thing we do know it that Kerry will ask the U.N. permission to use the toilet and any decision that is any more serious than that as well.

 

Ok, so who does Vince vote for? Michael Badnarik. Why? Out of the three he has stances on issues that are well thought out, even if I don't agree 100% The biggest is the war in Iraq. What would Mike do? Pull the troops and bring them home. Amen brother. What about the next time terrorism strikes? In Mike's own words:

 

"The proper response would have been to present the evidence as to who committed the heinous act both to Congress and to the people, and have Congress authorize the president to track down the individuals actually responsible, doing everything possible to avoid inflicting harm on innocents. "

 

The second reason I would vote for him: "Gun Control Means Being Able to Hit your Target." This guy understands that part of the reason terrorists have a field day with us is that 70% of us are completely ignorant to the right to a firearm. We think people who own them are sociopaths and need to have their guns removed. However, a nation of citizens who are well-armed is quite less inviting to a terrorist as we might just start shooting back.

 

For more info on Michael Badnarik visit http://www.badnarik.org .